Thursday, October 28, 2004

The NY Times pulls a C-BS and is loose and fast with the facts.

This is big. Not suprisingly, once again the media has rushed to print a story which is meant to be damaging to the President. In C-BS fashion the NY Times reported a "huge" story, essentially blaming the US for losing account of 370 tons of explosives.

On Sunday night, New York Times Executive Editor Bill Keller told Jeff Fager, executive producer of CBS's "60 Minutes," that the story they had been jointly pursuing on missing Iraqi ammunition was starting to leak on the Internet.
"You know what? We're going to have to run it Monday," Keller said

However, ABC news later ran a story claiming that when they arrived no explosives where there.

NBC's Jim Miklaszewski, who was embedded with the Army's 101st Airborne Division during the war, reported Monday that the unit visited the Qaqaa weapons facility on April 10, 2003, and never found the explosives.

Most interesting was a report that the Russians were allegedly carting off explosives before the invasion in addition to destroying all evidence of any contractual relations between Iraq and Russia

It certainly seems that the liberal media is a one way ratchet, always turning tight against the republicans.


At 8:59 PM, Blogger millersam said...

Did President Bush capture Osama Bin Laden?
He had 3 years time.

At 7:14 AM, Blogger J-Red said...

Seems to me Clinton had a lot longer time and did nothing to eradicate high level members of Al Queda.

At 9:41 AM, Blogger DCDuck said...

which media station/paper does the best job of being non-biased or atleast minimizes its bias? I keep flipping through stations and dont know where to call home.

At 12:25 PM, Blogger Bear said...

DCDuck, watch a little of all, vary your sources, just be aware of their bias. Or pick one with your bias and watch it. for me.


Post a Comment

<< Home